Ian Collard Will Testify in Writing, Not in Person

The Foreign Affairs Committee has announced that Ian Collard, a key figure in an ongoing vetting inquiry, will not attend the meeting in person. Instead, he has chosen to submit his evidence in writing.

This decision comes amid ongoing discussions about the vetting process and its implications. The committee had hoped to hear directly from Collard, believing that face-to-face testimony could provide valuable insights. However, the choice to provide written evidence means that committee members will have to analyze his responses without the benefit of follow-up questions or immediate clarification.

Collard’s role in the inquiry has raised significant interest, as the committee examines various aspects of the vetting process. The written testimony will still contribute to the overall understanding of the issues at hand, though some members may find it less satisfactory than a personal appearance.

The committee will review Collard’s written submission thoroughly to ensure they gather all necessary information. Moving forward, they will decide how to proceed based on the contents of his testimony.

This situation highlights ongoing tensions in the inquiry, with various witnesses choosing different methods of providing information. Some have appeared in person, while others have opted for written submissions, reflecting a variety of approaches to the investigation.

Image: BBC — source